Return to the Paleontology Menu
In Texas, my adopted state, I haven’t had to travel
far to find fossils. In fact, most of
my fossils have been collected in a radius of less than one city block from my
house and a few were found in my backyard.
Most of my specimens belong to the Fort Worth Formation of Tarrant
County, Texas, which, according to online sources, has been placed in the Lower
Cretaceous Period. Important exceptions
to this ongoing collection were found in North Richland Hills, Haltom
City, Southlake, near Grapevine Lake, also in Tarrant County, and the nearby
Dallas area—the latter two locations belonging to the Woodbine Formation. Unlike my other collections, my efforts in
my adopted state have really just begun.
My Texas collection is an ongoing project, which will be upgraded with
each new discovery. Included in this
brief introduction, are three excellent links to the geological history of
north Texas: North Texas Fossils, Surface
Geology of Dallas and Tarrant Counties, and Geology of North Central Texas. Before presenting my Texas Collection, I
pause to generate a stratigraphy (geological column) of the North Texas
area. The important exception to this
stratigraphy is my Upper Pennsylvanian brachiopod shown below.
Across the street from my house in Fort Worth Texas, I discovered a mother lode of gryphaea (“Texas Oysters”). As the photo below illustrates, the matrix of the slab filled with gryphaea is solidly packed with these marine invertebrates. I estimate that the strata are nearly ten feet thick and are so dense that there is scarcely any non-fossiliferous matrix. I found a similar phenomena in Haltom City where the creek had worn the conglomeration down, but in North Richland Hills, the gryphaea were loosely scattered on a hill. All three locations, including the excellent specimen I found near my home, are filled with other marine invertebrates shown below, but the gryphaea constitute at least ninety percent of the Lower Cretaceous deposits in this quadrangle. The few samples of clams were found in my wife’s garden.
Note –To enlarge photo, click Zoom to reach magnifier then click to enlarge photo. To return, click back arrow on top of page.
Compared to the much larger
gryphaea oyster, exogyra arietina is not impressive. For me it’s its bizarre shape that makes it unique. Unlike its larger cousins, I found in North
Texas, which look like fossils, the arietina shells almost seem as if they were
picked up off the shoreline of a beach.
Note –To enlarge photo, click Zoom to reach magnifier then click to enlarge photo. To return, click back arrow on top of page.
Ammonite Fragment
There are many excellent ammonite specimens
showcased online and at the above-mentioned paleontological links. Until very recently, however, I failed to
find in my fossil hunting in Texas any evidence of this sought after marine
invertebrate. There have been several
locations cited, which I haven’t visited, but all I could find so far is one
fragment, discovered almost by accident on my daily walk. Looking down at the local park trail in my
neighborhood, I spotted the unmistakable ridges and spine of an ammonite
shell. Because of its location and the
surrounding surface geology (Kpd), I estimate that it’s the same age as my
gryphaea, shown above. Geologists have
given this formation an ambiguous label: Denton/Weno/Pawpaw undivided. So far, after investigating Rufe Snow vacant
lots in Richland Hills, the Haltom City and Park Glenn areas, and my own
backyard, I had been convinced there were no ammonites in this quadrangle, but
I was wrong. Because my neighborhood is
private property and the nearby park is a restricted location for collection,
I’m not sure if I’ll risk a fine.
Hopefully, there might be accessible road cuts in the future and, on my
daily walk, I’ll stumble across another specimen, this time a whole
ammonite. Shown below next to a similar
specimen identified in Lance Hall’s site (North Texas Fossils) is my ammonite
fragment.
While exploring my daughter’s
large backyard in Southlake, Texas, I discovered an interesting slab (possibly
uncovered during the building of the house).
I haven’t attempted to extract fossils from it. In fact, I decided to leave it in its
present state. So far I have
identified species of turritella, gastropods, and pelecypods. Because my daughter’s house is very close to
Lake Grapevine, I was able to date it and place it in the correct time
period. According to a geological map I
discovered online, I’ve determined that this specimen is within the Woodbine
Formation (Upper Cretaceous).
Note –To enlarge photos, click Zoom to reach magnifier then click to enlarge photo. To return, click back arrow on top of page.
When I literally stumbled across these tiny fossils, I was unfamiliar with the geology of Texas, especially when I saw the small brachiopods up close, but my brachiopods from Graham County, Texas, look very similar to brachiopods I found in New Mexico that are also of Upper Pennsylvanian age (Neospirifer dubari and Neospirafer alatus). Later I discovered on Lance Hall’s North Texas Fossil site, a family of brachiopods (neochonetes) that look very similar to my own samples, as well as the neospirafer alatus from New Mexico. A modest selection of these small brachiopods is shown below to compare with the neospirafer alatus from my New Mexico Collections given in the preceding link.
Note –To enlarge photo, click Zoom to reach magnifier then click to enlarge photo. To return, click back arrow on top of page.